Drawing for PAPERTRADER

USPTO serial 75342976

PAPERTRADER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAPERTRADER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CURTIS L HARRINGTON

CURTIS L HARRINGTON CURTIS L HARRINGTON & ASSOC6300 STATE UNIVERSITY DRLONG BEACH, CA 90815UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software used for computational data base manipulation, for simulating transactions and not for actual performance of trading and not related to commercial paperACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 19, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 19, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 7, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 5, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 13, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance