USPTO serial 75344125
WOODFLAME GRILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOODFLAME GRILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE I. COLLEN
COLLEN IP TOWN OF OSSININGTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEWESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | (Based on Intent to Use) fuel oil, wood chips for use as fuel | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) cooking, grilling, and barbecuing apparatus using generally wood fuel, namely, barbecue grill, smoker, camp wood burning stove, wood burning stove, outdoor wood burning heater, hot water heater, fish grill, bread grill and electric hotplates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WOODFLAME INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WOODFLAME INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Maestro Grill Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named WOODFLAME GRILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |