USPTO serial 75344342
MB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Auburn Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW J HALIW III
ANDREW J HALIW III HALIW SICILLIANO AND MYCHALOWYCH37000 GRAND RIVER AVE STE 350FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | leather travel bags, leather travel garment bags, leather trunks, leather luggage straps, leather handbag straps and backpacks | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1978 |
| 025 | men's and women's jackets and pants, leather boots and shoes and to denim wear, namely, jackets, pants, shirts, and vests; also to men's and boy's wearing apparel, namely, shoes, underwear, clothing belts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, woven shirts, sweaters, cardigans, vests, jackets, pants, sweatpants, shorts, hats, caps, coats, underwear and clothing belts and to women's and girl's wear apparel, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirt, tank tops, woven shirts, sweaters, cardigans, vests, jackets, pants, sweatpants, shorts, hats, caps, coats, underwear and clothing belts and to sportswear, namely, ski wear jackets, pants, sweaters, headbands; swimming trunks, swimming coverups, tennis shorts, tennis shirts, tennis shoes, golf pants, golf shirts, soccer uniforms, basketball tank tops, basketball shorts, baseball pants, baseball shirts, baseball hats | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |