Drawing for CAKE CANDLE

USPTO serial 75344387

CAKE CANDLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAKE CANDLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MITCHELL H STABBE

MITCHELL H STABBE DOW LOHNES & ALBERTSON PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004frosted pillar candlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 12, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 15, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 15, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 5, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 5, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 16, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance