USPTO serial 75344770
MUSEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE K NODINE
NANCY K GARDNER NEEDLE & ROSENBERG PC999 PEACHTREE ST STE 1000ATLANTA, GA 30309-3915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | picture frames | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |