USPTO serial 75345832
MILLENNIUM CARILLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILLENNIUM CARILLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES H MELVILLE
CHARLES H MELVILLE STRAUSS & TROYTHE FEDERAL RESERVE BLDG 150 E FOURTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | musical instruments, namely, carillon systems comprising a series of chromatically tuned bells and an electronic device for reproducing the sound of chromatically tuned bells and means for controlling the bells to play music, sold as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |