Drawing for GORILLA BAR

USPTO serial 75345938

GORILLA BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERMAN, ALLISON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GORILLA BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD N. ARONSON

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Metal hand tools, namely, wrecking bars, utility bars, nail pullers, crow bars, digging bars and slate barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 18, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 18, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 13, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 13, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance