USPTO serial 75346027
TOUGHWIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2000
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOUGHWIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
GENERAL CABLE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, KY
Other trademarks owned by GENERAL CABLE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meredith M. Wilkes
Meredith M. Wilkes Jones Day901 Lakeside AvenueNorth PointCleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnet wire | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL CABLE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TOUGHWIRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |