USPTO serial 75346112
USE 4
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3851902Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with USE 4?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY PERVANAS
JEFFREY PERVANAS RICHES MCKENZIE & HERBERT2 BLOOR ST E STE 2900TORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Antifreeze, brake fluid, power steering fluid, motor vehicle tire inflator sealers, fuel injection cleaner chemical additive, chemical additives for fuel treatment, radiator flush, windshield de-icer fluid, windshield de-icer spray, fabric protectant for clothing, textiles, carpets and motor vehicles interiors, mold compounds for use in concrete fabrication, plastic industry, motor vehicles, waterproofing chemical compositions for articles of fabric and leather and the interior and exterior of motor vehicles, stain repellants for shoes, stain repellants for leather jackets and leather coats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |