USPTO serial 75346233
MASTIFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASTIFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MuZ, Motorrad- und Zweiradwerk GmbH
09401 Zschopau-Hohndorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by MuZ, Motorrad- und Zweiradwerk GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes; aromatic essential oils for personal use; body and beauty care products, namely, cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetic skin creams, soaps, body detergents hair spray, shampoos, after shave lotions, mascara; cosmetic kits consisting of nail brushes, nail files, nail clippers, razors, cosmetic pencils, lipsticks, skin lotions for cosmetic purposes, make-up, make-up powder; nail polish, nail care preparations, shaving preparations, shaving soap, shaving foam, skin cleaning preparations, sun-tanning preparations, hair lotion; teeth cleaning materials, namely, tooth paste, and non-medicated mouth wash; body soaps; household cleaning, polishing, grease removal and grinding materials, namely, cleaning oils, sand paper, emery paper, emery boards, cleaning paste, shining preparations; washing and bleaching materials, namely, detergents and stain removers, windshield cleaning liquids, rust removing preparations, laundry washing powders and liquids | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | land vehicles, namely, motorcycles; structural parts for land vehicles, namely, starters, mufflers, brakes, frames, frame parts, direction indicators, horns, transmissions, clutches, motors, valves, cylinders and drive belts; motorcycle seats; motorcycle wheels; motor scooters; electric scooters; bicycles; tricycles; motorized tricycles; tires; wheel trims | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | clocks and chronometers; jewelry; precious gemstones; and precious metals and their alloys sold in bulk | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |