USPTO serial 75346766
CEDAR KEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CEDAR KEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD V STOTLAND
HAROLD V STOTLAND SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON42ND FL55 E MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-5803Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | fishing lures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |