USPTO serial 75346851
QUALITY MAPPING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITY MAPPING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW R BASILE
ANDREW R BASILE YOUNG & BASILE PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3197UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, software used to manage quality systems for the purpose of certification of private, business and governmental entities according to national and international quality standards | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2000 |
| 042 | computer software maintenance | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Mapping Solutions L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Mapping Solutions L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUALITY MAPPING SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |