Drawing for OPEN EYE

USPTO serial 75347273

OPEN EYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPEN EYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT A DIERKER

ROBERT A DIERKER IMCI TECHNOLOGIES8401 OLD COURTHOUSE RDVIENNA, VA 22182UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software in the fields of network management and telecommunications via client server and closed computer network technology for network monitoring and management and for data and voice processing and transmission equipment monitoring and management; computer hardware and integrated software systems comprising computers and computer software for network monitoring and network management for use in the fields of network facility monitoring and management and computer network monitoring and network managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 27, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 20, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance