USPTO serial 75347274
JPI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, VANESSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JPI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA M DITE
BARBARA M DITE GALLOP JOHNSON & NEUMAN LC101 S HANLEY STE 1600ST LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | electrode holders, ground clamps, cable connectors, safety specatcles and goggles, safety caps, visors, welding helmets, darkening filters for use with welding helmets, welding helmets with attached air purifiers and face shield headgear; industrial safety equipment, namely, floor stands and barricades; traffic safety equipment, namely, traffic cones and collars therefor, fences, pavement marking tape, traffic signs, reflectors, traffic delineator posts, barricades, channelizers, electronic warning lights and arrowboards, sign stands, warning flags, safety vests, belts, armbands and suspenders | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |