USPTO serial 75347275
IMCI INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMCI INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A DIERKER
ROBERT A DIERKER IMCI TECHNOLOGIES21301 BEAUMEADE CIRASHBURN, VA 20147UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software development services in the fields of client/server, network management and telecommunications; computer network integration services, namely, design, implementation, management and administration of computer network services; computer hardware development services, namely, the custom design or integration of computer hardware to meet the specific needs of others; providing access to a global information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |