Drawing for SEAN JOHN

USPTO serial 75347683

SEAN JOHN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEEGARS, GERALD C.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEAN JOHN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E APOLZON

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003fragrances and personal care products, namely, cologne, perfume and body lotionACTIVE—
009sunglasses, eyeglass frames, eyeglass cases, eyeglass chains, and eyeglass lensesACTIVE—
014jewelry and watchesACTIVE—
018handbags, small leather articles, namely, wallets and key cases; pocketbooks, back packs and all purpose sport bagsACTIVE—
025footwear, and fashion accessories, namely, belts, ties, gloves, scarves, socks, hosiery and women's lingerieACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 10, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Aug 10, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 5, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 20, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 25, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 6, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 17, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance