Drawing for PARTITION WIZARD

USPTO serial 75347744

PARTITION WIZARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARTITION WIZARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas A. Chaikin

DOUGLAS A CHAIKIN PENINSULA IP GRP16275 S MONTEREY RD STE FMORGAN HILL, CA 95037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, for managing hard drivesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 6, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 31, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 23, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 22, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance