Drawing for LAUGHING DOG

USPTO serial 75347968

LAUGHING DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAUGHING DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD B ROCKMAN

HOWARD B ROCKMAN SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL8000 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets and hatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 10, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 5, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 16, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 1999PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 23, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 27, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance