USPTO serial 75348205
CASINO ARIZONA AT SALT RIVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2000
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CASINO ARIZONA AT SALT RIVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
INGA REGENASS
INGA REGENASS VAN COTT BAGLEY CORNWALL & MCCARTHYP O BOX 45340SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0340UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community, The
- Other trademarks owned by Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community, The
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CASINO ARIZONA AT SALT RIVER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| May 3, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |