USPTO serial 75348594
BRANTANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRANTANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS J MOORE
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS625 SLATERS LN 4TH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | (Based on Intent to Use) LEATHER BAGS, NAMELY, OVERNIGHT BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS AND ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS; AND UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on 44(e)) FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on 44(e)) FRANCHISING, NAMELY, OFFERING TECHNICAL ADVICE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF RETAIL STORES THAT FEATURE FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER BAGS, NAMELY, OVERNIGHT BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS AND ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, AND UMBRELLAS; COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER BAGS, NAMELY, OVERNIGHT BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS AND ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, AND UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |