USPTO serial 75348810
SECURE PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECURE PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B HUGHES
ROBERT B HUGHES MICHAEL F HUGHES HUGHES LAW FIRM, PLLCSTE 3024164 MERIDIAN STBELLINGHAM, WA 98226Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing consulting, administration, management and support services for health care providers, insurance agents and agencies, insurance providers, insureds and potential insureds; providing for health care providers, agents and agencies, insurance providers, insureds and potential insureds, namely , medical cost and health care management, health care cost containment; health care cost review; health care utilization analysis and review services; regulatory filing and compliance; cost accounting; computerized accounting services; accounting services; employment counseling and recruitment; providing statistical information; profit survey and analysis; preparing advertisement for others; placing advertisement for others; direct mail advertising; telemarketing | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1997 |
| 036 | Medical insurance underwriting; Insurance claim administration; electronic processing of insurance claims and payment data; insurance agency in the field of health care; underwriting insurance for prepaid health care; medical insurance underwriting; assisting in establishing and coordinating relationships in these activities between health care providers, insurance agencies and agents, and insureds | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named SECURE PARTNERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |