USPTO serial 75348875
CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLE A. MICKELSON
CAROLE A MICKELSON GREER BURNS & CRAIN LTD300 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation and maintenance services for electronic systems comprising computer control units and accessories thereof, for controlling building resources in specialized areas, namely, environment, security, ventilation, fume hoods, fire and smoke equipment in specialized areas | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Landis & Staefa, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Landis & Staefa, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |