USPTO serial 75349465
BEVERAGE BOULEVARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2001
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEVERAGE BOULEVARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
BOISE, ID
Boise, ID
Boise, ID
Boise, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. POLLEY
Richard J. Polley Klarquist Sparkman, LLP121 SW Salmon StreetOne World Trade Center, Suite 1600Portland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail supermarket services featuring beverages in a beverage aisle or section of a grocery store | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Albertson's, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Albertson's, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Albertson's, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BEVERAGE BOULEVARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |