USPTO serial 75350088
SONDIUS-XG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONDIUS-XG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Hakamatsu 430, JP
Hakamatsu 430, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRET E FIELD
BOZICEVIC, FIELD & FRANCIS LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVE STE 200EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer hardware for use in electronically generating sound; recording devices for sounds and images, namely, audio and video cassette, CD, magnetic disk and digital audiotape recorders; transmission devices for sounds and images, namely, televisions, radios and computers; electronic circuits, reproduction devices for sounds and images, namely, computers, magnetic tape copiers, digital audio tape copiers, CD copiers; storage media for sounds and images, namely, blank magnetic data carriers, digital audiotapes, recording disks and CDs and pre-recorded magnetic data carriers, digital audiotapes, recording disks and CDs that are pre-recorded with data sufficient to electronically generate sound; audio mixers, sound effectors and music sequencers; interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software that are capable of electronically generating sound | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | karaoke machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Hand held units for playing electronic games that are capable of electronically generating sound; board games that are capable of electronically generating sound; toys, namely, dolls and models that are capable of electronically generating sound | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services for others, namely, computer programming related to synthesized sound | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
- Other trademarks owned by Yamaha Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Yamaha Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SONDIUS-XG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |