USPTO serial 75350244
TAPEKO FLAVOURS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAPEKO FLAVOURS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CA
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M LABARGE
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL O'TOOLE GERSTEIN MURRAY & BORUNSEARS TWR STE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | colorants for use in the manufacture of food and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | milk, yogurt, butter, dried milk, cheese, margarine, cooking oil, salad dressing, potato chips, cheese spreads, jams, jellies, soup mixes, processed soups, dried fruit, fruit topping, chicken, non-dairy creamer, fish, sausage, luncheon meat, and canned meat | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | beverage flavoring syrup, food flavoring being non-essential oils, frozen, pre-cooked, dried, premixed and ready-to-use dough, ice cream, sherbet, breakfast cereal, pretzels, crackers, cookies, candy, ketchup, mustard, sauces, honey, coffee, tea, iced tea, icings for bakery foods, puddings, chocolate, flavored and sweetened gelatins, cocoa, sugar, rice, chicory-based coffee substitute, flour premixes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Poulgouras, Konstantinos
- Other trademarks owned by Poulgouras, Konstantinos
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TAPEKO FLAVOURS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |