USPTO serial 75350462
ACCESSPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCESSPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL E DERGOSITS
MICHAEL E DERGOSITS DERGOSITS & NOAH LLPSTE 1450FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing electronic funds transfer services through remote terminals for consumer and merchant accounts maintained by financial institutions and financial services, namely, providing and facilitating electronic funds transfer and debit/credit transactions for banks, professional offices, and retail merchants and financial services, namely, managing electronic data transmission for transfer of value, payment and support data and for automated adjustments of accounts, claims and captured debit/credit cards or electronic funds transfer services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |