USPTO serial 75350466
NUTRILITE KAKADU PLUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRILITE KAKADU PLUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY E ZWICK
MARY E ZWICK AMWAY CORP LEGAL DEPT7575 FULTON ST EADA, MI 49355UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and personal care toiletry preparations, namely, toilet soaps and hair care preparations; skin care preparations, namely, body lotions, suntan and sunscreen lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary or food supplements comprised of vitamins, minerals, herbs, plant concentrates, fatty acids, fiber, algae, amino acids, or live active cultures; and grain-based dietary or food supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Fruit or nut-based snack bars fortified with vitamins, minerals, or protein powders; and non-dairy creams | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Corn syrup or flour or grain-based snack bars fortified with vitamins or minerals; breakfast cereal; tea; and snack foods, namely, cookies and flavored puffs of corn | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | mixes of use in the preparation of non-alcoholic fruit, chocolate, vanilla or similarly flavored soft drinks fortified with vitamins and minerals; non-carbonated fruit or vegetable drinks; non-carbonated calcium-fortified soft drinks; and sports drinks or drink mixes to make sports drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMWAY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AMWAY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NUTRILITE KAKADU PLUM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |