Drawing for NATURAL FOOD RESTAURANT

USPTO serial 75350543

NATURAL FOOD RESTAURANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAL FOOD RESTAURANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042food service rendered by means of a mobile unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 19, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2002LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE—
Dec 18, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2001PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Jul 16, 2001PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jul 10, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 29, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2001PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
May 25, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 18, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 10, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 1, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 29, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 19, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 14, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance