USPTO serial 75350559
INTELLEARN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLEARN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAUREN L MARTEL
LAURENCE D MARTEL37B BOW CIRP O BOX 5784HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29938Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation in the field of personnel training and management, said consultation being rendered to corporations, governments, schools, and associates, based on research based processed in neurosciences, neurophysiology and cognitive sciences | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |