USPTO serial 75350686
FUEL CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUEL CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS L TSCHIDA
DOUGLAS L TSCHIDA LAW OFFICE D L TSCHIDA633 LARPENTEUR AVE W STE BSAINT PAUL, MN 55113-6544UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | vending machine services for fuel, petrochemicals, air, vacuum cleaning and snack food; and leasing and rental of vending machines for fuel and petrochemicals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |