USPTO serial 75351201
TODD-AO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TODD-AO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROD S. BERMAN
ROD S BERMAN JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP2121 AVE OF THE STARS, TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture and sound equipment, namely, cameras, projectors and tripods and pedestals for same; editing, splicing, and rewinding apparatus; sound recording, transfer, re-recording and reproducing apparatus; sound dummies; film reels and magazines; microphone, speakers, and parts for the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Video transmission for satellite and cable broadcast | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Todd-AO Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Todd-AO Corporation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named TODD-AO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |