Drawing for DIGITORK

USPTO serial 75351552

DIGITORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2903558Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 16, 2004
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DIGITORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE 10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical control panels for digital torque control of electric industrial tools, namely electric nutrunners, and in particular, power driven fastener spindles thereforSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2025CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 16, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 24, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 24, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 20108.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Dec 3, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2010ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 16, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 16, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance