USPTO serial 75351968
LUXURY-REALESTATE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUXURY-REALESTATE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY R DUVALL
GARY R DUVALL GRAHAM & DUNN1420 5TH AVE STE 3300SEATTLE, WA 98101-2390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing information in the field of luxury real estate sales, and luxury real estate brokers, and links to related information, by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |