Drawing for GAIANET

USPTO serial 75352156

GAIANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAIANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD L ADAMS

EDWARD L ADAMS KATTEN MUCHIN & ZAVIS1999 AVE OF THE STARS STE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6042UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper goods and printed matter, namely, a series of fiction books; a series of non-fiction books featuring information about computers and multimedia; comic books; comic book reference guide books, general-interest magazines; books featuring information about new forms of media; picture books; children's books; coloring books; educational books, text books, educational work books and newsletters featuring information about computers and multimedia; graphic novels; address books; address labels; appointment books; cook books; diaries; photograph albums; scrap books; printed postcards; note cards; posters; greeting cards; playing cards; calendars; personal planners; notebooks; binders; decals; stickers; stationery; envelopes; pens; pencils; pen and pencil cases; book covers; book ends; book marks; bank checks; check-book covers; bumper stickers; rubber stamps; and cels, namely, film duplications of individual frames of motion pictures and videos, computer-assisted or manual renderings and/or reproductions of images created by computer-assisted or manual renderings, and other reproduced images initially used for incorporation into a motion picture or video to be purchased and used as artworkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 19, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 27, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance