USPTO serial 75352212
MEDI-KID "SAFETY AT YOUR FEET"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDI-KID "SAFETY AT YOUR FEET"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | removable insole with hidden pocket containing medical, emergency and identification information for immediate access in the case of emergency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Thomas James
- Other trademarks owned by James, Thomas
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Lee Ann
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Lee Ann
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MEDI-KID "SAFETY AT YOUR FEET"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |