USPTO serial 75352593
FUZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bristol, BS12 2JT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D PETER HOCHBERG
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPATHE BAKER BLDG1940 E 6TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software, namely, applications specific integrated circuit boards, graphic processors, image processors, graphic controllers, image controllers, integrated circuits for use in relation to graphics and images, software for use with all the aforesaid hardware; software algorithms | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed matter, namely, printed publications in the nature of bookelts, elaflets, brochures and manuals, all relating to computer hardware and software, namely, applications specific integrated circuit boards, graphic processors, image processors, graphic controllers, image controllers, integrated circuits for use in relation to graphics and images, software for use with all the aforesaid hardware; software algorithms; stationary; instructional and teaching materials, namely, those relating to computer hardware and software, namely, applications specific integrated circuit boards, graphic processors, image processors, graphic controllers, image controllers, integrated circuits for use in relation to graphics and images, software for use with all the aforesaid hardware; software algorithms | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting services featuring graphics technology; design and engineering services in the computer graphics technology field; and development of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |