USPTO serial 75352622
OKEY DOKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OKEY DOKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-8808 Pfaffikon, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | WATCH STRAPS AND WATCH BANDS OF PLASTIC, CERAMIC, METAL, TEXTILES, KNITTED MATERIAL, LEATHER AND COMBINATION OF THESE MATERIALS; ANKLE AND JEWELRY BRACELETS; AND BELT BUCKLES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER, AND GOODS MADE ENTIRELY OR PREDOMINANTLY THEREFROM, NAMELY, BRIEFCASES, WALLETS, PASS HOLDERS, BELTS, KEY CASES, KEY FOBS, TRAVEL BAGS, BRIEFCASE TYPE PORTFOLIOS, FANNY PACKS AND OVERNIGHT CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | BELT AND CLOTHING BUCKLES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |