USPTO serial 75352672
DIGITAL VIDEO EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, STACEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL VIDEO EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAPHAEL V LUPO
RAPHAEL V LUPO MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital video disc players capable of electronic transmission of data and images; prerecorded digital video discs featuring a variety of motion picture films and educational programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail outlets featuring digital video discs | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | pay-per-view digital video disc services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | rental of digital video discs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIGITAL VIDEO EXPRESS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Zoom Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DIGITAL VIDEO EXPRESS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |