USPTO serial 75352845
TOTAL ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTAL ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
White Plains, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB
666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | distributorships featuring natural gas liquids and natural gas, heating oil, coal, propane and electricity to commercial, residential and governmental end-users and distributors to end-users | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | brokerage of energy | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | distribution of natural gas liquids and natural gas, heating oils, coal, propane and electricity to commercial, residential and governmental end-users and distributors to end-users | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |