USPTO serial 75352957
EXADYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXADYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Roadtown, Tortola, VG
Roadtown, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C MCELWAINE
JOHN C MCELWAINE NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH151 MEETING ST STE 600CHARLESTON, SC 29401-2207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing facilities, including ancillary services and equipment appurtenant thereto, for assisting and organizing business meetings or conferences; business management and consultation for exporters of industrial consumer goods | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 2001 |
| 038 | transmission of facsimiles; electronic mail services; hosting on-line computer communications sites; rental of message sending apparatus; store-and-forward electronic and voice messaging services | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 2001 |
| 042 | language translation; rental of computers and computer software; providing multiple-user access to a global computer network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; making reservations and booking for temporary lodging; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Methods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Methods Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXADYS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |