Drawing for ARCO SHARED SERVICES

USPTO serial 75353658

ARCO SHARED SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, STACEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCO SHARED SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT E LEE JR

ROBERT E LEE JR ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO2300 W PLANO PKWY J3508-PAIPLANO, TX 75075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035procurement services, namely, purchasing business forms, chemicals, offsite reproduction services, drilling services, environmental services, facilitates maintenance services, information technology services, information technology equipment, telecommunications equipment and services and office supplies for othersACTIVE—
036providing the administration of employee benefit and pension plans and financial and administration services, namely tax and accounting, actuarial, and billing and performance reporting servicesACTIVE—
042legal servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 23, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 18, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance