USPTO serial 75354103
ABC NORTHWEST, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABC NORTHWEST, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILLIP T WISEMAN
3000 MARKET ST NESALEM, OR 97301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertisement promotional materials | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |