USPTO serial 75354201
PPD RUBTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2003
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PPD RUBTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shebrooke, Quebec, Canada, CA
Shebrooke, Quebec, Canada, CA
Shebrooke, Quebec, Canada, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD R FRASER
DONALD R FRASER FRASER MARTIN & MILLER LLC28366 KENSINGTON LNPERRYSBURG, OH 43551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | RUBBER BEING A RAW MATERIAL FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING SNOWMOBILE WHEELS, CAR TIRES, AND CONSTRUCTION FLASHINGS; SNOWMOBILE WHEELS, CAR TIRES, AND CONSTRUCTION FLASHINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | MANUFACTURE OF RUBBER RAW MATERIAL TO ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |