USPTO serial 75354329
GLOBAL HEALTH SOCIETY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL HEALTH SOCIETY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAGUNA HILLS, CA
MISSION VIEJO, CA
MISSION VIEJO, CA
Mission Viejo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL LUBLINSKI
MICHAEL LUBLINSKI KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP8000 TOWERS CRESCENT DRSTE 1200VIENNA, VA 22182Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing health information, particularly relating to dietary and nutritional regimens | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL HEALTH SOCIETY
- Other trademarks owned by WAKUNAGA OF AMERICA CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by WAKUNAGA OF AMERICA CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by WAKUNAGA OF AMERICA CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GLOBAL HEALTH SOCIETY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |