USPTO serial 75354601
BEANSTALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEANSTALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario K1S 1A9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. BUNCH
JOHN W BUNCHONE CORPORATE CTR STE 3007300 METRO BLVDMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for searching and updating databases across global computer informationa networks, wide area networks and local area networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |