USPTO serial 75354916
CMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2003
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HERBORN, DE
Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
DE-35745 Herborn, DE
Other trademarks owned by Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
DE-35745 Herborn, DE
Other trademarks owned by Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
DE-35745 Herborn, DE
Other trademarks owned by Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN D ERICKSON
KEVIN D ERICKSON Pauley Petersen & Erickson2800 W HIGGINS RDSTE 365HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cabinets, namely, metal and/or plastic control boxes, racks, housings and panels for electronics, computers, and communication devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | air conditioning units and heat exchangers, air filters for air conditioning units, air filters for domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | non-metal clamps; air conditioned, earthquake and/or vandal and/or explosion proof cabinets; non-metal thereaded fasteners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RITTAL GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Rittal-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named CMC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |