USPTO serial 75355017
KITTY VAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KITTY VAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E CATES
CHARLES E CATES CATES AND HOLLOWAYP O BOX 1532SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85252-1532UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Fitted housings containing mechanical air filters and replaceable filters for use on cat litter box covers | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alkire, William E.
- Other trademarks owned by Alkire, William E.
- Other trademarks owned by Benz, David
- Other trademarks owned by Benz, David
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named KITTY VAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |