USPTO serial 75355109
ART ATTACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ART ATTACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JILL M PIETRINI
JILL M PIETRINI MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS11355 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of art supplies, school supplies, stationery, toys, videotapes, CD-ROMs, clothing, books, and children activity kits comprised of multiple activity and educational toys | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing children's activity centers that allow children to play games with multiple activity and educational toys | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |