USPTO serial 75355129
CHICAGOLAND PHONE CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 1999
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHICAGOLAND PHONE CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Flushing, NY
IDT Netherlands, B.V. (Puerto Rico Branch)
El Paraiso Industrial Park, San Juan, PR
Other trademarks owned by IDT Netherlands, B.V. (Puerto Rico Branch)
Flushing, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY PAT ATWOOD
LUIS J DIAZ ESQ IDT CORPORATION520 BROAD STNEWARK, NJ 07102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pre-paid telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded, intended to be marketed in and around Chicago | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PT-1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDT Netherlands, B.V. (Puerto Rico Branch)
- Other trademarks owned by PT-1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named CHICAGOLAND PHONE CARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 10, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |