Drawing for NEW YORK PHONE CARD

USPTO serial 75355138

NEW YORK PHONE CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW YORK PHONE CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY PAT ATWOOD

BRUCE E LILLING SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN LLPP O BOX 560GOLDENS BRIDGE, NY 10526-0560UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016telephone calling cards, not magnetically encodedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 15, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 7, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 20, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 14, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance